Gonna quote a french poster on UC (Oswin):
So I am shocked to see this game The guy has not even done any research on our flag. The white symbolizes the monarchy, then see the King Louis XVI crowned with a red back, however, a mistake.
Red usually symbolizes the bloodshed, then why did the sash white back ....
In short, this deck is not for me ... I go my way.
(Google translator sorry)
He sent an email to the creator about this, to which he replied:
Hey Oswin,
Thanks for feedback. I figured I would probably mess something up historically. It was originally supposed to be two decks. Just red and blue. The white came in as a third extra deck as a way to tie in the two decks. Unfortunately, I think it would be weird to switch the colors right now, so I'll probably keep it the way it is.
Sorry if it offends you ;_;
And my own reaction to this:
You know, I probably would have pledged for these if I hadn't found out about the points Oswin made. It would be a much better collection piece if you could actually say stuff like "...and since the red in the french flag represents the bloodshed...". And I was late for the triple EB as well.
There's also the fact that to see the differences in the courts and how they fit together you have to take out and look at all 3 decks at once. Each deck by itself isn't really that interesting, and the back designs are kinda boring.
And "it would be weird to change the colors now" isn't really a good reason. Sounds like the creator just thinks it fits better in his own head, and would rather have it that way than historically correct. Doesn't give me a good vibe.
Pass.