You are Here:

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - WKalush

Pages: 1 [2]
26
This example is apparently from the Steve Forte Collection… It's supposed to be exceptionally rare… Is anyone familiar with this design?

That's the Bee back 250 ca. 1913. There are rarer ones. Has anyone seen a card or a pack of Bee back 217?

bk

27
Also we changed how we handle shipping charges and I would be interested in any feedback from those who have bought now and also previously.

When shipping was included, I could always get more (I did that with the Black Legends - placed an order and then an hour later decided to get another brick.)
This way, today I got 8 to make sure I got some, but with $5.95 in shipping I'm not going back to get anymore, even if I have second thoughts.

Although we don't explicitly state it on our website we always try to work with people on reducing the shipping as far as possible. We definitely don't like the idea of making money on shipping. This shipping method is an experiment and my preference has always been to include shipping in the price. But that works out better when we have brick or more prices and the guys buying 2 or 3 decks at the single deck postpaid price gets dinged a bit. Having said that we do respond to customers' requests about consolidating shipping and we do sometimes refund excess shipping paid, even when it's "included" in the price.

bk

28

Pardon my continued ignorance - Is really really soft good or bad?  My main goal has always been to find the best handling deck, and so far nothing has matched the Exquisites, but I'm looking to pick up one of those Pr1mes and want to make sure I get the right one :)

I agree with you that the Blue Exquisites are the best yet (even better than the Red).
If you like the Exquisites then you should try the red Pr1mes. When I say the blue Pr1mes are sometimes too soft I mean they were freakishly soft. I don't know what happened in the production but they are crazy soft (some decks, that is). I would bet you will like the red Pr1mes.

bk

29
But my question is: only 235 decks were produced at all? Or only 235 were available for CARC?

We have only released 235 (almost every deck we have on hand) but I expect a small quantity more to come in. But these might never make it and might be damaged when they do (both common scenarios unfortunately). The only way to guarantee you'll get a deck is to order them now.
Another poster complained the price is too high, and I agree. But with these small runs and, to be frank, paying Lawrence more for them this time, so we had to increase the price. This won't be the standard and we will always fight to offer decks at the best prices we can.
Also we changed how we handle shipping charges and I would be interested in any feedback from those who have bought now and also previously.

bk

30

Bill or anyone that may know - when you say first Pr1me decks, does that refer to the 001 1st and/or 2nd editions?

I'm referring to both the first two Pr1mes. I realize that there was some differences in printing but the quality and feel seems to be the same. The Sketch and now No1r are substantially different.
Although having said that I found that some of the blue Pr1mes are really really soft, but not all! I don't know why or how to tell other than to open them and flex them.

31
Hi Don,
Sorry about my slow response but I was away.
I've decided that Conjuring Arts will carry the No1r deck. I'm not sure on the price but they won't be super expensive. Probably $7.95 a deck plus shipping.
One caveat is that these are from a different factory than either Pr1me editions or Sketch decks. For me, as a cardman, I prefer the first Pr1me decks over either sketch decks or No1rs but that is just me. In fact after using the same Pr1me deck (red) for over a year it is still a favorite. After they break in they stay in a very Jerry's like condition and I love that. This is not the case for the Sketch decks and I haven't field tested the No1r enough to make any claims about it.
We will build a product and have the decks available very soon.

bk

32
A Cellar of Fine Vintages / Re: 1881 Sportsman's #202
« on: January 07, 2014, 05:25:20 PM »

Very interesting… Tom, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the Bee No.92 Back No.67 still the longest running design to have ever been printed?

The no. 67 is still being printed in modified form but that designation and design didn't start with Bee.
Prior to Bee's creation (in 1892) NYCC sold the No. 67 in a form that is substantially similar, but not identical, to what is still sold as a Bee no.67. The number and design predate Bee. NYCC also sold Steamboats No. 67 simultaneously with selling Bee no. 67, and the back (but not the stock) was the same.

As far as the Bee branded version of No. 67 being the longest running design, the Bicycle Rider predates that.

bk

33
Interesting they used the first Bicycle Ace & Joker - instead of the fancier second Ace. Don't like the back!

When Karen was in charge of the brand they were hyper careful about not doing anything that could be seen as diluting their trademarks (i.e. printing variant Bicycle Rider backs, even if they had done so previously). They extended this mania to the point that they would not allow me to use the first Bee Ace of Spades because they reasoned it wasn't their current trademark so could dilute their rights.
They might have decided this Ace of Spades was safer than the prettier second state. According to those in the IP world their reasoning isn't completely rational but over-cautious.
Just my theory.

bk

34
Yes Tom, we can get started any time. We are definitely willing to use Ask Alexander as the search engine for it.

bk

35
Congrats, nice one. You will notice that when they show the faces they don't put them over a spot printed for a back design.

36
Introduce Yourself / Re: Hello From Bill Kalush
« on: January 02, 2014, 12:06:17 PM »
Hi Splice,
Thanks for the kind comments and I'm very glad you will get one of these green bibles. I made those originally just for myself to give friends from time to time. Last year we released a handful at Christmas and thought this would be nice again this year.
Regarding Erdnase cards. I think the D & D Erdnase deck you are referring to is actually our Erdnaseum deck. Dan and Dave were partners on the run in that they paid for half of it and sold half of it but we actually did the design.
The deck that fits your criteria closest is our Erdnase 216 deck which is the Bee 216 back and original Bee faces. The spots are very similar to modern ones and the Courts are original Bee and not exactly like modern but similar. I'm very proud of the finish on these cards as it is as close as I could possibly make with modern technology to a Bee deck from the time of Erdnase. It took a great deal of research to create that finish. Have you tried them?
We are doing one final deck in our Erdnase series (Smith V3 or Signature Edition) and I can say that it will be bordered, green and quite different than any others we have done. Unfortunately I don't think we will do any in a smooth or ivory finish. And one thing that sort of disqualifies them for your use is that we will once again use the old USPCC courts and spots that have smaller indices (like all the Smith and Acorn series did). Sorry about that! One good thing though is the name Conjuring Arts won't be on the deck. Some have complained that this sometimes makes an observant spectator (in your case another player) suspicious that he cards are marked or gimmicked in some way.

bk

Yes, both decks I can see on the D&D website are CARC productions. The one I'm referring to isn't there any more, I think it's out of print. This is the deck I'm talking about.

I believe that deck was done by Brent Geris of the Magic Apple. Our original Erdnase 1902 were stuck in the USPCC pipeline when those came out. I was a little disappointed that ours weren't first but that's my fault for not being pushier with USPCC.

bk


Cool, glad to hear you will work with USPC again! About test print runs, have you ever had a run go well and sold it? Such as one of Erdnase decks or other USPC CARC decks? Also what do you do with the remaining decks from a test run?



Hi John,
The test runs I have done I've used standard backs (Bees and Bicycles) and most of the results were excellent. But since they don't strictly conform to what Bee and Bicycle retail feels like we agreed not to retail them. So I just use them myself! (and the Bees especially were terrific). These tests were how we created what I call the "Erdnase Finish" for our Erdnase 216 deck. I would say the Erdnase 216 came out about 85% as good as the results of our most successful test run.
Hope these few details help.

bk

37
A Cellar of Fine Vintages / Re: 1881 Sportsman's #202
« on: January 01, 2014, 02:38:07 PM »
Great deck Tom, especially that tuck case. Reminds me of that amazing Faro deck Jim Faller had.

38
I would literally give my right arm to anyone that provide me scans of these backs and other NYC backs. These backs are what I've been searching for, for a basis for my Kings wild signature series. Any body please help.

Hi Jackson,
You send the arm and I'll send the scans!! Actually better keep the arm attached but just sign it over to me ;)
You will see all the NYCC backs and much more very soon my friend.
Happy New Year.

bk

39

I believe one would need to find older sample books to have a shot at seeing that back.  Either that, or the design was for some unknown reason pulled at the last minute, after the sample book was printed but before the insertion of the samples, which is why it was replaced with face-up cards in the various sample books.  There's a chance, though slim, that the back might even appear in advertising of the same period.  I don't supposed USPC created something akin to a mail-order catalog that had pictures of the backs rather than actual samples?  The missing back might appear in such a thing, if it exists.


On further research I can find no image or other reference to the Bee 178 back. My theory is the same as yours. Either the Sample folders are misprinted and this was how they fixed it or they had 178 in development and pulled it after the folders were produced. All the folders from NYCC that I've seen are from this same era and NYCC did samples differently at other times.
Presently back 178 is a phantom.
I'm not sure about USPCC but NYCC did issue some catalogs but none that I have show back 178.

bk

40
Having gotten curious about back 178 I checked my set like this and it has back 178 reversed and mine shows the 2 of diamonds. In going through some papers from Jack Farrell I have photo copies of his sample folder and his no. 178 is also reversed and shows the 7 of diamonds. Now it's clear that this was intentional and leads to the question, what was Bee back 178??




41
A friend emailed me and stated that he thought the two of hearts, which states Grade No. 92 Bee, Back No. 178 may have been placed upside down in error… Any thoughts from the new owner / aficionado? Thanks… J.

I have quite a few of these sample folders from NYCC and I believe that a reversed card was meant to show the faces and also when they did that at a specific position, like back 178, it might mean that back was out of print or no longer offered. Just a theory and more research would be necessary to determine if their purpose was as calculated as that. But I can state that these sample sets do change considerably in what is offered for sale and reversed cards are often on them.

42
The Source - Card Collecting 101 / Re: Bee Cards - Let's Catalog the Backs
« on: December 30, 2013, 11:44:56 AM »
Seems to be a lot of interest in Bee decks on this Forum. As a thought - let's see how many different backs there have been since the first deck in 1892. As a start, here is a page from an price list of New York Consolidated Card Co. I imagine there'll be a few surprises there for everyone. Let's hope we wake up in the morning and find a mint Bee deck in our stocking. MERRY CHRISTMAS!

I think I've tracked down most of them (with much help from Tom and Judy and others). The price lists are especially helpful as they show what comes in and then goes and are dated. What is the date on the one you scanned Tom?

bk

43
Introduce Yourself / Re: Hello From Bill Kalush
« on: December 30, 2013, 11:01:29 AM »
Thank you to everyone for the kind welcome.
I'm delighted to participate in the forum and very happy that it's now Tom's baby and will be more integrated into the 52 Plus Joker.

bk

44
Introduce Yourself / Re: Hello From Bill Kalush
« on: December 27, 2013, 05:17:55 PM »
Hi Fingerz and John,
On my trip to China Lawrence came along for part of it and we have worked together on his Legends as well as my Exquisites and the Carbon Clips.
EPCC will work closely with Lawrence and his Legends card company on many new products coming soon. Some will be co-releases as well.

We definitely will work with other factories and are actively searching for them everyday. As long as they are better than what we are doing or can do innovative things we will work with them.

We sincerely love USPCC. Not so pleased about their Skull project but the brand manager that did that to us is gone and that's water under the bridge. I have made so many decks with USPCC that I understand their process very well and will definitely print with them again. I have an order in with them as we speak but it's primarily for research and I probably won't release them retail. But I have several other decks in the works that can only be printed with them and I am also consulting with friends who are printing there. I'm helping them get the exact feel and cut they want. It's a surprisingly difficult thing to get USPCC to do precisely what you want. You have to be able to tell them exactly what you want and then follow through so that don't leave anything out. It's a big place and lots of moving parts.
I can also say that since Bill Schildman took over and has now made Ashley and Tiffany his point people on custom they have greatly improved how things work over there.

bk

45
Introduce Yourself / Hello From Bill Kalush
« on: December 27, 2013, 04:04:52 PM »
Hello All,
I made a post on the Discourse a few days ago and Don Boyer suggested I write a little introduction and post it here.
I'm first and foremost interested in sleight of hand with cards. It's this long held interest that led me to start experimenting with custom cards over 25 years ago.
Being that I started into serious study of card magic in the early 80's I was lucky enough to have cut my sleight of hand teeth on cards produced by USPCC in the 70s and early 80s before they fully adopted plastic coating. We used to have to use fanning powder to keep a deck from getting too sticky to use. As USPCC changed their coatings cards kept getting slipperier and slipperier and this caused me and others to try to collect up unused older packs. Not so much for collecting value but for a sure supply of cards we knew how to handle.
In 1988 I was in a position to introduce a new potato to the American market called Yukon Gold and in commemoration we produced about 1500 decks at International Playing Card Co. in Windsor. I was very lucky and the cards came out beautifully! I wish had more than a couple dozen decks left! This deck had the "paper" feel that USPCC was migrating away from at that time.
My interest in sleight of hand has never waned but my further interests in magic and magic history have grown over the years. In 2001 I started a foundation for the study of magic history and in 2003 this foundation started to operate a real library and research center in New York City. It's expensive to fund the payrolls etc of the librarians and employees so a few years later after Ellusionist and David Blaine had started doing custom decks I decided to get reacquainted with USPCC and to attempt to produce some custom decks with a difference. My primary interest in this new endeavor has been to produce excellent feeling and handling cards. My foundation, Conjuring Arts Research Center, started to produce large runs of cards at USPCC primarily because I believe that their web press uses a superior coating thus making better cards. Over the many decks we did at USPCC we experimented with many different papers and other changes to attempt to get what I consider excellent cards. I feel that many of the cards we have sold at Conjuring Arts represent the finest handling cards presently produced. Near the end of 2012 we decided to expand our horizons and to attempt to find and work with factories world wide. I decided that the foundation would start a proper playing card company as a separate entity and The Expert Playing Card Company LLC was formed. Very simply the EPCC exists to produce the world's best cards for those who actually use them. All proceeds and profits from anything Conjuring Arts or EPCC sells go strictly to charity. No profits are ever kept from our playing card or any other magic related ventures.
To persue more potential factories I personally went to China and visited many factories and met with even more makers who came to see me. After scouring as many as possible I decide to work with 2 asian factories. The first EPCC production was our Global Titan deck. This deck has a distinct feel and for many it performs better than almost anything else on the market. Nonetheless the coating is still a little too platicy for all tastes and the way they are cut out, although good, still has some minor cupping that you don't see with USPCC cards. The Global Titans also are designed to look a certain way. My own personal taste is for cards from the golden period of 1870-1920 and we decided to pattern our decks and style after the venerated NYCC. The Global Titan deck used a back design that Dougherty, NYCC and others used from as early as 1864 and this was really an American classic design. Historians will obviously see that we repurposed artwork from NYCC brands for Global Titans tucks, bricks and faces as well.
Looking for even better edges and a subtler coating the EPCC's second venture used a different factory and we again used rare early artwork and great Art Nouveau ideas for our Exquisite decks. We feel these cards are the best yet and without a doubt the edges and registration are the finest we have found anywhere in the world.
The EPCC is about how cards feel and we will continue to search the globe for factories with high standards and who can work with us to create cards that perform. We also realize that there are those who think calling ourselves a Playing Card Company without owning a factory is improper but that is how the world has always worked. Even now the largest company in the world, Apple Computer, doesn't own a factory. They design, commission and sell their products and can shift from factory to factory as they need to in order to compete. EPCC is no Apple computer but the "designed by" model is the same.
We have also sought out close ties to Tom and Judy Dawson and have learned a great deal from them and they have helped EPCC start a strong collection of early playing card designs. You will definitely see some of these long lost beautiful old decks revived and reintroduced for the 21st century. They will not be decks that are just reproductions but things will be modified and updated and hopefully made to appeal to a modern aesthetic.
I hope this introduction tells you a little about me and why Conjuring Arts and EPCC are in the business of selling playing cards.

Bill Kalush



46
http://www.fantasmamagic.com/proddetail.php?prod=carcli&cat=81

The quality might not be the same.

I'll take my Ellusionist large sized Porper Clip every time.

Just to set the record straight. Our Solid Carbon Fiber clip is nothing like the one Fantasma is selling. Theirs is a metal Porper ripoff covered with a plastic sticker that resembles carbon fiber.
Our clip has no metal at all in it, it's just pure CF formed into a clip and polished.

Pages: 1 [2]