You are Here:

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Collector

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 22
26
Playing Card Plethora / Re: The Lumberjacks 2nd Edition (KS)
« on: March 30, 2015, 01:57:48 PM »

I have to say that I am not a fan of this gaff. IMHO (as always) - the back design without leaves (or even with slightly chopped ends of branches) could be more interesting for magicians.

I didn't know you were a magician.  Where do you perform?

No, I am not a magician. I am a spectator. And as a spectator I can imagine what gaff card will look better for such trick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjzvEAyA0TE

27
Playing Card Plethora / Re: The Lumberjacks 2nd Edition (KS)
« on: March 28, 2015, 12:26:14 PM »
I have to say that I am not a fan of this gaff. IMHO (as always) - the back design without leaves (or even with slightly chopped ends of branches) could be more interesting for magicians.

I wonder if there is a chance to create a seal in a shape of a leaf.

28
Creators are strange people to communicate.

29
Playing Card Plethora / Re: The Joker and the Thief Deck [KS]
« on: March 28, 2015, 12:14:18 PM »
I still don't see any story. Does this deck really have it? Or the whole story is in the statement that it exists.
This campaign is driven by very young people. It is so clear. Nothing negative - just the obvious fact.

30
I really want these decks to succeed this time, so I'll be posting Tweets on Twitter, Facebook and other sites like this one:

http://twitter.com/CthulhuWho1/status/579621718144073728

And I'm curious about how well other card collectors think messages like this will work towards card deck projects; and how often I should post them.

Will Hart
Fullerton, California

ps
Can this topic get updated so the current project and its link and images are at the top instead of the older project links and details?
 

Let me support you in this. Several modest words...

http://playingcardcollector.net/2015/03/22/nouveau-playing-cards-by-bona-fide-playing-cards/

31
Playing Card Plethora / Re: The Joker and the Thief Deck- (3/20/15 KS)
« on: March 21, 2015, 07:22:09 PM »
Hello all!

I hope you're all doing well. We are launching very soon so i thought I'd post a few more photos here and give you a little insight into our EB Special!

For our Early Birds, 200 Individual decks of cards will be available for $10USD each.

Since we are from Australia, the campaign will be in AUD, just to keep that in mind. For your convenience we've put the converted prices in USD in the pledge options, just so you know what you're paying :)

Here are some more photos!
...

Not a big fan of the seal. Court cards are very nice.

Noticed the uncut sheet. I have to say that The Queen of Spades, Hearts and the Jack of Diamonds are a little disappointment - their size -> disharmony.

Good luck. Tell your story about the deck.

32
Playing Card Plethora / Re: The Joker and the Thief Deck- (3/20/15 KS)
« on: March 20, 2015, 07:09:21 PM »
Hello all!

I hope you're all doing well. We are launching very soon so i thought I'd post a few more photos here and give you a little insight into our EB Special!

For our Early Birds, 200 Individual decks of cards will be available for $10USD each.

Since we are from Australia, the campaign will be in AUD, just to keep that in mind. For your convenience we've put the converted prices in USD in the pledge options, just so you know what you're paying :)

Here are some more photos!

https://instagram.com/p/0YegYFGZ7V/?tak ... mesmilaras (COURT CARDS)
https://instagram.com/p/0bFP6sGZ1Z/?tak ... mesmilaras (BOX: SEAL)
https://instagram.com/p/0V61dlmZ1X/?tak ... mesmilaras (IN ACTION - SYBIL)
https://instagram.com/p/0Sb87GGZ39/?tak ... mesmilaras (IN ACTION - FRIFFLE)
https://instagram.com/p/0QzvKImZ7A/?tak ... mesmilaras (IN ACTION)

Not a big fan of the seal. Court cards are very nice.

34
Design & Development / Re: The second edition of the Lumberjacks
« on: March 15, 2015, 12:13:06 PM »

??? I don't see how I have hijacked this thread. And I always thought that the forum is for mutual exchange of opinions. I can try to find time and logically prove why the approach described by me is more useful for the campaign. And I also can easily find illogical things in answers on my above mentioned thoughts.

Other thing is that I also don't like the approach described by me. But, unfortunately, there are things that we like and find more logical, fair, and there are things that just work. Kleetz have chances to lose up to 30% of potential funding without regular updates and reveals of new designs of playing cards. IMHO, of course.

But it isn't my campaign, so I am calm about the chosen approach for it. It has started, so the approach isn't already important. Now the design and enough quantity of its fans are more important. The design is nice.

Good luck, Kleetz.

You're calling it your opinion, as in "In My Humble Opinion (IMHO)," yet you're quoting hard statistics from an unnamed source.  When you do that, you're actually presenting what you believe to be facts.  How, precisely, can he lose up to 30% of his funding by not using a tease campaign, and what's your information source?

Or are you trying to be contrary for the sake of being contrary?

It's very simple.  There likely are some people out there who love being teased through a deck campaign, be it Kickstarter or an ad campaign from a privately-funded deck producer.  I'm not one of them, and I know many others who are not - they've said as much in these boards.  Those of us who feel this way consider this to be our opinion and personal preference.  Do I have hard numbers?  No.  But as I'm not offering statistical facts, I don't really need hard numbers.  There's no point in refuting an opinion - it's just an opinion.

You're free to offer your opinions here; even anecdotal observations are cool.  But if you want to offer facts, back them up somehow.  Otherwise, they're still just your opinion.

Now please - let's drop this or take it to PMs.  Stay on-topic.

First of all, I’d like to find out how the second part of this

...You're free to offer your opinions here; even anecdotal observations are cool…

refers to this discussion? I have to think that this is your traditional quick switch to personal and attempt to offend any person having alternative opinion. You started from hijacking, then “anecdotal observations” and “stay on-topic”.

So, I am on-topic. This is an active Kickstarter project now and any discussion of its positioning, development or promotion is an integral part of the theme. When you post thousands of words (sometimes quite abstract) in every thread dedicated to different Kickstarter project it is a norm. When someone has an alternative opinion – it is off-topic.

...Or are you trying to be contrary for the sake of being contrary?

I don’t. But, unfortunately, you do. And this time you surpassed yourself. You invented non-existent fact in my message and then accused me of its groundlessness (factually of its absence). Have you ever heard any person ending to prove the Pythagorean theorem by words, “IMHO, of course”?

Let me discover a new world for you. “…Kleetz have chances to lose up to 30% of potential funding…” is just a value judgement – the same as your “…I know many others who are not - they've said as much in these boards…” (in this particular thread, only you and Kleetz among 10.000 registered users).

I understand that such things as “IMHO”, “I assume…”, “I suspect…”, “I suppose…” are a big problem for you. You don’t think within such categories. But try sometimes to read what people write before to comment that. Don’t interfere in communications of other members giving your assessments of other’s messages which you don’t understand and which aren’t directed to you (this is already about some other threads).

Any patience has its limits. There is a small embryo of BM Pokerworld in you. And it is growing. I say this as a person who has been writing on this forum several years and remember your first posts here. Try to understand that this Earth doesn’t revolve around your “I”. Otherwise, you will turn this forum into the place for your monologs.

P.S.
Please, save your time and don’t post here hundreds of rude jokes/hints and strict offences. I won’t read them anyway. I really hope you will change something in your world outlook and will find your harmony with surrounding world.

36
Design & Development / Re: The second edition of the Lumberjacks
« on: March 09, 2015, 04:59:30 PM »

I think you didn't understand me. From what I understand on the basis of your test Kickstarter page - you are going to reveal all faces at the start of your campaign. So, you won't be able to reveal something due to that. That's why I said what I said. And I think that it is important to reveal faces step by step on Kickstarter because it helps to keep crowd's interest in your project on a higher level. Just thoughts ;)

That's a matter of opinion, Collector.  Personally, before I back a project, I like to SEE what it is I'm backing!  :))  I don't need to be strung along with silly, unnecessary teasers - I'm a big boy now.


Are you going personally to secure the funding of this project? :)

It's a matter of opinion. But as a big boy you could see a lot of strange or even illogical things these days. Don't you know that 60% of on-line materials are written not for people but for Google and Bing :) Re-read all those "amazing" instructions "How to attract 10000000... on-line users to your product", etc. Entertaining reading... till the moment you understand that it really works for modern users :O

Collector, drop it.  It's an opinion.  Agree to disagree and leave it be.  We've hijacked this thread enough.

??? I don't see how I have hijacked this thread. And I always thought that the forum is for mutual exchange of opinions. I can try to find time and logically prove why the approach described by me is more useful for the campaign. And I also can easily find illogical things in answers on my above mentioned thoughts.

Other thing is that I also don't like the approach described by me. But, unfortunately, there are things that we like and find more logical, fair, and there are things that just work. Kleetz have chances to lose up to 30% of potential funding without regular updates and reveals of new designs of playing cards. IMHO, of course.

But it isn't my campaign, so I am calm about the chosen approach for it. It has started, so the approach isn't already important. Now the design and enough quantity of its fans are more important. The design is nice.

Good luck, Kleetz.

37
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Virtuoso Playing Cards 2015 - Coming Soon
« on: March 08, 2015, 11:53:27 AM »
Collector: why?  What's with the color chart?

This -

Might be the other designs of virtuoso in the future haha  :D

38
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Tendril Ascendant (Encarded)
« on: March 08, 2015, 11:52:04 AM »

39
Design & Development / Re: The second edition of the Lumberjacks
« on: March 08, 2015, 11:50:35 AM »

I think you didn't understand me. From what I understand on the basis of your test Kickstarter page - you are going to reveal all faces at the start of your campaign. So, you won't be able to reveal something due to that. That's why I said what I said. And I think that it is important to reveal faces step by step on Kickstarter because it helps to keep crowd's interest in your project on a higher level. Just thoughts ;)

That's a matter of opinion, Collector.  Personally, before I back a project, I like to SEE what it is I'm backing!  :))  I don't need to be strung along with silly, unnecessary teasers - I'm a big boy now.


Are you going personally to secure the funding of this project? :)

It's a matter of opinion. But as a big boy you could see a lot of strange or even illogical things these days. Don't you know that 60% of on-line materials are written not for people but for Google and Bing :) Re-read all those "amazing" instructions "How to attract 10000000... on-line users to your product", etc. Entertaining reading... till the moment you understand that it really works for modern users :O

40
Playing Card Plethora / Re: The Joker and the Thief Deck- (3/20/15 KS)
« on: March 07, 2015, 10:51:04 AM »
In the end of the day can be a very nice deck. I hope all court cards will be different.

Good news! Every single court card has been designed from the ground up. They're all different :)

Nice.

41
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Tendril Ascendant (Encarded)
« on: March 07, 2015, 10:49:34 AM »

42
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Virtuoso Playing Cards 2015 - Coming Soon
« on: March 07, 2015, 10:45:09 AM »
 ;)


43
I can't remember a custom deck devoted to bowling. Good idea.

I think number cards will be the most interesting in these decks. But I have suddenly mixed feelings about court cards. That combination of clothes, theme, and a crown looks a little bit odd. Randy, just as an experiment and in case of some time for that, can you supstitute the crown with a baseball cap. Put a picture of a crown on that cap. Different crowns for different courts of suits as for different bowling teams. IMHO.

44
Design & Development / Re: The second edition of the Lumberjacks
« on: March 07, 2015, 10:28:26 AM »
I am not sure that it's a good idea to reveal all court cards at once.

Actually, it's not a bad idea. I can post updates revealing more cards.

Thanks collector!
-Kleetz

I think you didn't understand me. From what I understand on the basis of your test Kickstarter page - you are going to reveal all faces at the start of your campaign. So, you won't be able to reveal something due to that. That's why I said what I said. And I think that it is important to reveal faces step by step on Kickstarter because it helps to keep crowd's interest in your project on a higher level. Just thoughts ;)

45
Design & Development / Re: The second edition of the Lumberjacks
« on: March 06, 2015, 09:28:18 AM »
I am not sure that it's a good idea to reveal all court cards at once.

46
Design & Development / Re: What makes a good playing card deck?
« on: March 06, 2015, 09:23:09 AM »
H-Y-Y-Y-P-E  :)

47
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Regal Playing Cards (GW)
« on: March 06, 2015, 09:21:36 AM »
Well, the design becomes better and better.

48
So, courts are almost the same.

49
More decorative elements on the brick box  :D  :D  :D

 :)

50
Playing Card Plethora / Re: Leonardo Art Playing Cards (KS)
« on: March 06, 2015, 09:18:08 AM »
More pictures of the Platinum Edition (courts)?

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 22