Well, I do know that the card designs are mostly being done by value, hence that's why I'm asking if the person in-charge of all the sixes will mind letting me do just the 6 of clubs. I apologise then for phrasing my request wrongly.
As for the back design, I guess my idea is flawed, thanks for pointing that out. Regarding the read-whole-word-up-side-down design that you commented, my first thought was, did the artist for runit deck thought the same too? that once the concept had been used, it cannot be reused again? If enigma can be the first, runit can be the second, why can't we be the third? IMO what matter most is how you are going to use the same concept yet be able to produce something different.
Also I guess your last paragraph must be referring to the signature on the card itself (since that's the only part I used the word 'should'). Well I just feel that people should know who is the artist that designed/draw that artwork unless you are telling me that the ad card will be stating clearly 'who and who did which value, etc'.
Well, as I had said from the start and end of my post, these are just my two cents regarding the deck and your comment is well appreciated. I do know the direction you guys are heading, however, I think that my suggestions aren't off the track yet and I thought that feedback, suggestions and opinion are allowed. Of course if you guys think otherwise, I hereby apologise for posting and wasting your time reading them. Good luck.
Poll
