It's not a review so much as it is an advertisement... You honestly think if the deck sucked or had bad features he'd post about it in a "review"?
To be fair, however - which decks printed by USPCC have sucked in the past year?
Crimson deck, Crimson Resurrection deck, the Big Guns were slow to sell at the $50 price point they were released at, almost any T11 v2 deck because the only difference between v1 and v2 is the box instead of the cards, Bicycle Irregular, Bicycle Apollo, A.Bandit, any Bicycle deck designed by Merz67 (Trace series, Red White & Blue series, Zebra)...
The quality of the deck is all in who designed it and what finish and stock they chose. Does Mana look good? Of course. Would I trust ANY designer's review of their own deck? Not for a second. It's like a father or mother being asked to "review" their newborn infant...