You are Here:

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - variantventures

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
76
Design & Development / 15th Century French Deck
« on: November 05, 2014, 10:55:34 AM »


I'd like to emphasize that the courts are not my design work.  I took images of a surviving deck and cleaned them up a little.  There were only two Jacks in the surviving cards so I decided to flip those and use them to substitute for the missing Jacks rather than creating new ones.  I already don't like the darkness of the faux-antique background and I'm definitely going to lighten that up.  The pip cards are arranged according to French standards and I pushed them as close to the edges of the cards as I dared.  I may have to move them more to the center and leave a larger border around the edges depending on how the test decks work out.  The originals would have been right up to the edge of the card.  I like the diamonds, clubs, and spades but the heart needs a little work.

I've got two other 15th century French decks to work on and then I'm going to bang out a bunch of 18th century decks (I've got images of six complete courts for those).

77
The Conversation Parlor / Re: USPCC Museum
« on: November 03, 2014, 11:21:21 AM »
It would be nice to see a groundswell to have the collection put online.  Perhaps a kickstarter with a limited edition deck as a reward? Yes, I'm being puckish.  In the meantime you can see some of the collection here:
http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015008195458;view=1up;seq=11

I understand the actual cards in the collection are over-shadowed by the books in the library that goes with the collection.

78
The Conversation Parlor / Re: USPCC Museum
« on: October 31, 2014, 04:00:51 PM »
Heard back from USPCC today and they say they still have the collection in storage.

79
The Conversation Parlor / Re: USPCC Museum
« on: October 31, 2014, 11:53:27 AM »
Good one.  This author indicates the collection was returned to USPCC in 1983.

80
The Conversation Parlor / Re: USPCC Museum
« on: October 30, 2014, 02:04:04 PM »
Last night I found a reference on the Carey-Yale website which claims the collection went to the Cincinnati Museum of Art.

81
The Conversation Parlor / USPCC Museum
« on: October 29, 2014, 12:31:38 PM »
Does anyone know what happened to the collection that made up the USPCC museum?

82
Design & Development / Re: Is it Just Me, or is Something Wrong?
« on: October 22, 2014, 02:58:13 PM »
Limited editions feed into that compulsion - they practically amplify it.  That's fine for wealthy compulsives, but I'm an ordinary guy who happens to get a kick out of some of the cool deck designs out there and I'm NOT filthy rich, so I buy what I like and let someone else deal with the rest.
I think the second market is far larger than the first, but it's harder to reach them and harder to get money out of them in the same volumes. :)

83
Design & Development / Re: Is it Just Me, or is Something Wrong?
« on: October 17, 2014, 06:00:32 PM »

I see what you mean.  It may be possible that economics play a role in this.  While the technology has made it possible for people to do small print runs, the economics of large print runs are pretty much unchanged.  Selling a small batch of cards can be a lot easier than raising the funding for a large run of cards and then trying to find distributors.  And when you're working at those mass-production levels the profit per deck is measured in cents not dollars.

That said, people do seem to be going out of their way to create artificial scarcity.  Maybe it's because they're afraid of being stuck with unsold cards at the higher volumes or perhaps they're only interested in doing 'art' rather than 'business'.  You mentioned the woman making handmade decks.  I know of three people who make hand-made batches of playing cards.  They're much in demand amongst a very small group of collectors who can afford the prices they charge (which are very low when you consider the work that goes into those decks).  Those people are interested in making and owning pieces of art, not playing cards.

Of course economics play a role.  And yes, there's extra decks to be sold in most cases after the Kickstarter is over, unless the run was very short and funding just stopped - I've seen that happen a few times, though in most cases the creator simply releases an "unlimited" version of the deck, typically in a different color.

I'm not saying a deck of cards has to be sold in the quantities of a Bicycle Rider Back and at the same price points.  There is a middle ground, a sweet spot, where there's plenty of cards to go around at a decent price.  If there wasn't, the Bicycle Masters decks wouldn't exist, nor would the three basic colors of the Crown deck, the assorted non-rare colors of the NOC, Artifice, the Monarchs, etc. - without shipping or tax, these decks all sell for well under ten dollars a pack, and in most cases at discount for larger orders, often as little as buying three decks at once.

It's not cheap to order a deck in huge quantities, but it is manageable to order a print run of what would now be considered a "huge" amount - 5,000-deck runs used to be the norm because USPC was the only quality printer around and that was their minimum.  They weren't twice as expensive all the way around because of the lower per-deck costs.  Imagine finding a price point low enough that people are happy to buy these cards in bulk, or at least in greater amounts than they'd normally be able to afford if the deck was at least twice as rare and more than double the cost.  A company making a go of it could order 10,000, 15,000 or even 20,000 decks at a time if they sold well enough.

If Ellusionist and many others can do it, why can't more people?  They don't employ a zillion people - most of the companies we'd call "the majors" employ perhaps a dozen or less people, at least for their retail operations.  In other words, they're all manageable small businesses - one of the greatest sources of new employment in this country over the past decade.

What's the sweet spot?  Would the Masters decks exist if the Rider decks didn't exist?  Is it possible for a big company to do things a smaller company can't?  Sorry, I don't mean to be argumentative but I don't have answers to these questions.

I think you're correct that there is a niche for some smaller companies out there, but I also think most of the designers are doing this part time.  I did some back of the napkin calculations for my micro-business and determined that I could do it full-time with myself and two full time employees (preferably three) but in any event I would have to be a full time administrator (and part time sales guy) to do it.  Which meant I would have even less time to do design work than I have right now.  In effect, making my hobby my business would kill my hobby.  And I'd be taking a big pay cut even if I was wildly successful.

Maybe the niche is for a company that has the marketing skills and connections to take a design from the hobby stage to the middle ground.  I know I'd take a smaller profit per deck if a company took a lot of the marketing and fulfillment work out of my hands AND could sell to a larger audience.  My designs, of course, are a bad example here, but assume we're talking about someone with a contemporary design.  I haven't looked at any numbers to see if anyone can make a profit doing this, though.

Sorry.  Wish I had some answers when all I've got are more questions.

84
The Conversation Parlor / Re: Middle East Distributors
« on: October 07, 2014, 08:53:16 AM »
Hmm.... I'm going to take another look.  The impression I got from the description of terms and services led me to believe it wa delivery then payment rather than payment on delivery.  As so often happens, I could be wrong.  Thank you.

85
The Conversation Parlor / Re: Middle East Distributors
« on: October 06, 2014, 11:39:13 AM »
There's a certain cachet associated with American cards.  In the Middle East, for example, playing cards is nearly an act of rebellion and doing it with American cards just makes it more rebellious.  There's also a belief that American cards are better (because they're rarer?) so having American cards is a status symbol.  I also think cardistry is making new inroads for American cards as European cards aren't exactly designed with this in mind.

86
Design & Development / Re: 15th Century Italian Deck
« on: October 04, 2014, 10:31:35 PM »
Here's the 9 of swords.  These cards are based of multiple, partial 15th-16th Century decks.  The largest, but not the only, collection of these is in Budapest.  You can see them here: http://www2.printsanddrawings.hu/search/?return=1

87
Design & Development / Re: Is it Just Me, or is Something Wrong?
« on: October 04, 2014, 10:44:30 AM »
Nothing's wrong.  We've just had a couple of technological innovations come around that have made it possible for people to produce decks that weren't even marginally possible just a few years ago.  Advances in printing, in crowd-funding, in digital design software, in global communication... Now anyone with an idea can make a deck.  Odds are most of them won't be any good.  But a few will be and as people work with printers they are pushing the boundaries of what can be done with playing cards.  Think of it as evolution in action and sit back and enjoy the ride and try to pick the gems from the dross as they pass by.

I think you've missed the idea I was trying to get across.

Yes, it's possible - more easily now than at any time before - for nearly anyone to make a deck.  And yes, there will be crap decks and good decks, and it's largely subjective as to which fall into which category.

I'm specifically talking about how the costs of decks are rising and the size of print runs are falling, making the hobby more and more rarefied with each new release.  If taken to the logical extreme, there will be a release of a one-deck print run made of solid gold paper with laser-etched embossed cards, debossed boxes with limited edition "1 of 1" stickers, hermetically sealed cellophane impervious to the elements and depths up to 100 meters, etc. - and the few hundred of us still bothering to collect will be fighting tooth and nail over it, while the thousands who used to collect but gave up will shrug our shoulders.  Artificial rarity and higher costs versus a deck "for the masses" that people can afford as well as admire and will use and enjoy, confident in the knowledge that there's more where that came from.
I see what you mean.  It may be possible that economics play a role in this.  While the technology has made it possible for people to do small print runs, the economics of large print runs are pretty much unchanged.  Selling a small batch of cards can be a lot easier than raising the funding for a large run of cards and then trying to find distributors.  And when you're working at those mass-production levels the profit per deck is measured in cents not dollars.

That said, people do seem to be going out of their way to create artificial scarcity.  Maybe it's because they're afraid of being stuck with unsold cards at the higher volumes or perhaps they're only interested in doing 'art' rather than 'business'.  You mentioned the woman making handmade decks.  I know of three people who make hand-made batches of playing cards.  They're much in demand amongst a very small group of collectors who can afford the prices they charge (which are very low when you consider the work that goes into those decks).  Those people are interested in making and owning pieces of art, not playing cards.

88
Design & Development / Re: 15th Century Italian Deck
« on: October 04, 2014, 10:24:39 AM »
Yes, 1400 is the accepted cut-off date for block-printing on paper.  There is obviously some looseness to that date (they were block-printing on fabric by 1350, for example) but it's the date everyone uses for common reference.  We've got lots of surviving card examples from the 15th Century and they were block-printed and stenciled to a large degree.  They still made some by hand, the Ambraser decks spring to mind, as do the Topkapi cards, but mass production was needed to meet the demands for playing cards which were so popular by the end of the 14th Century that civic authorities were banning their use because they were causing problems.  The French, for instance, banned playing cards on work days.  Apparently they were popular enough that people were skipping work to play them.

I've added green to the final card, but this is pretty much the final design for the ten.  The original cards would have had a rectangular border but that limits the space I can use on modern cards (stupid rounded corners) so I've left it out.  I'll add the border back in for block-printed cards.

89
Design & Development / Re: Is it Just Me, or is Something Wrong?
« on: October 03, 2014, 06:36:36 PM »
Nothing's wrong.  We've just had a couple of technological innovations come around that have made it possible for people to produce decks that weren't even marginally possible just a few years ago.  Advances in printing, in crowd-funding, in digital design software, in global communication... Now anyone with an idea can make a deck.  Odds are most of them won't be any good.  But a few will be and as people work with printers they are pushing the boundaries of what can be done with playing cards.  Think of it as evolution in action and sit back and enjoy the ride and try to pick the gems from the dross as they pass by.

90
Design & Development / 15th Century Italian Deck
« on: October 03, 2014, 05:53:04 PM »

The ten of clubs/batons.  This is based on several surviving sheets from the 15th Century.  The goal is to make an entire minchiate deck (like a tarot deck but with more trumps) but I'm starting by making just the standard 52 card deck that is the core of tarot and minchiate decks.  The fuzziness of the lines is deliberate and meant to be visually similar to the wood-block printed decks of that time.  Likewise, the colors are deliberately offset a little because the stencil work on those mass-produced decks was rarely spot on.  Although it's a subtle difference, I've added a 'natural' white background rather than relying on the 'brilliant' white background of the card-stock.  I feel it really makes a difference.

Yes, Don, I've got a French deck in the works.  I'm just not ready to share any of it yet. :)

91
The Conversation Parlor / Re: Middle East Distributors
« on: September 29, 2014, 04:33:07 PM »
Just updating this.  After a bunch of research I narrowed this down to the two services which came up first in my casual searches: e-Souq and Jumia.  Both of them are pretty much slightly less capable versions of Amazon.  Two consistent issues have come up with these services:

The first issue is pricing.  Both services forbid you from selling your products for lower prices elsewhere.  This means you, technically, must sell your cards at the inflated prices these services require.  Why do I say they require inflated prices?  Because both services tack a fee on top of your purchases.  This is not unreasonable but they do so in non-US currency.  So as the exchange prices fluctuate so do the prices of your finished items.  This is not a deal-breaker for me as I've seen any number of vendors who are breaking or sidestepping this rule.

Cash on Delivery.  This is the deal breaker.  Because the vendors who sell through these services are not trusted (with good reason) the customers in the Middle East and North Africa demand Cash on Delivery terms.  There's more to the issue, of course, credit cards have not widely penetrated the region and online fraud is an enormous problem and etc...  But what that boils down to is I, as a vendor, have to ship the cards to the customer.  The customer can simply say the product never arrived and walk away with them.  They can't do a lot of this, but they can do it.  And there's always the possibility that the product doesn't arrive because it is lost or stolen enroute.  Not a huge problem, but still a problem.  If the customer doesn't like the product they can return it.  It gets returned to the service, not to the vendor, and the service is generally just going to throw the product away.  But leaving all that aside and assuming a perfect sale, the service still doesn't release the purchase funds to the vendor for four, or more, days.  But they take their cut of the sale as soon as it happens.  If anything goes wrong it's up to the vendor to file the paperwork requesting a refund.  Paperwork that takes days or (according to horror-story reviews) weeks to be reviewed and approved.

The long and the short of it appears to be that it's just not worth my while to sell in those markets.  I notice, however, that other vendors of playing cards appear to be making the attempt.  I don't know if it's USPCC doing the work, but I'm seeing a lot of Bicycle cards for sale abroad.  A more significant competitor appears to be the Chinese who are heavily pushing their metallic cards.

92
The Conversation Parlor / Re: Middle East Distributors
« on: August 21, 2014, 03:06:56 PM »
I think I've found a couple of options.  I'm going to give them a try next month.  If things work out I'll pass the information along.

93
The Conversation Parlor / Middle East Distributors
« on: August 20, 2014, 03:27:01 PM »
Kind of a long shot, but does anyone know of any playing card distributors in the Middle East?  Specifically Lebanon, Egypt, Bahrain, Morocco, Qatar.

I have some playing cards I think would be very well received there and would like to talk to a distributor.

Thanks.

94
Design & Development / Re: Build your own deck
« on: August 20, 2014, 03:20:45 PM »
Updating my answer to this question:  I'm working almost exclusively with Printer's Studio right now.  My customers are interested in the cards for their utility value.  They are going to pull them out and play games with them and use them (and use them up) under some pretty rotten conditions.  So low cost is currently winning.

I have found no difference in actual card quality between Make Playing Cards and Printer's Studio.  MPC comes out way ahead on options for packaging but since my customers aren't really interested in that, it's not a plus for me at this time.  I look forward, in the future, to having nice tuck boxes, seals, and so on, but not yet.

Printer's Studio is also offering the option of selling my cards through their website (ala Cafe Press or Zazzle).  It's not my preferred option right now, but as they improve the capabilities of the site it's starting to become an acceptable option.  Currently I have to fulfill orders by processing payments and placing the order with the printer.  Once Printer's Studio gets their site a little better organized I won't have to do that.  I'll be able to upload my designs and Printer's Studio will take care of payment processing, printing, and fulfillment.

The build your own deck option has been extremely popular with my customers.  It has also allowed me to take advantage of metrics.  I can see which designs are selling and modify the ones that aren't to try to make them more popular.  I've also been able to phase in new designs by bundling new suits with popular older suits and I've been able to offer custom decks where the customer wants a special suit rather than one of the standard suits I offer.

All in all, this has been an extremely good experience for me and I'm looking at expanding it by making two different decks with multiple suits for customers to select from.

Here's the current image showing the suits, and the card backs, we offer.  A version showing photographs of the finished cards is in the works.

95
Design & Development / Re: 14th Century Deck
« on: July 02, 2014, 11:36:28 AM »
I'll post pictures when I get the actual deck back from the printer.  I'm trying out MakePlayingCards for this set.

96
Design & Development / Re: Build your own deck
« on: July 02, 2014, 11:33:55 AM »
What is the printer you are using?
It varies.  Right now I am checking the price from both Printer's Studio and MakePlayingCards and going with whoever is the least expensive.  In that regard, Printer's Studio is tending to be the winner.  In addition to having lower costs in general they also charge less for shipping, despite being located in Hong Kong.  I think MakePlayingCards has a poor shipping cost calculator.  Three mini-size decks should not be twice as expensive to ship as one mini-sized deck.  That leads me to believe they have a per-unit shipping cost rather than a calculator that uses weight and size.

97
Design & Development / Re: Build your own deck
« on: July 02, 2014, 11:26:41 AM »
Oops.  I'm not pitching anything.  I was just discussing the flexibility that print on demand offers to designers rather than going with traditional batch printing.

In my case it allows for a lot of creative back and forth with customers.  The people I sell to can order a custom built deck from the available components and they end up with a product they're happier with rather than a 'one-size-fits-most' deck.  It also gives me, as a designer, some flexibility because I don't have to choose between doing a court with King-Queen-Jack or King-Knight-Knave, I can do all four courts and let customers choose which they prefer.

The downsides are, most obviously, the increased per-unit cost and the lower general quality of print-on-demand cards; no metallic inks, lighter card weight, lower quality finish, and etc...

98
Design & Development / Build your own deck
« on: July 01, 2014, 01:52:46 PM »
Print on Demand has it's pluses and minuses.  On the down side they tend to be of inferior quality and more expensive on a per-deck basis.  On the up side you can do projects that just aren't economically viable in larger print runs and the ability to customize can be powerful.

Playing cards reach Southern Europe sometime around the middle of the 14th Century.  By the last quarter of the 14th Century they've reached Northern Europe, specifically Germany, and the Germans go nuts for playing cards.  The printing industries there used no less than thirteen different suits, some of them intended for export to other countries.  This includes: coins, cups, swords, hearts, acorns, leaves, bells, shields, crowns, flowers (several types), birds/hawks, dogs.

I put together a basic deck with a King, a Queen (which the Germans didn't use), an Over/Knight, and Under/Jack/Knave, and 10 through 1.  The German/Swiss decks tend to use a banner/10 and drop the 1.  They also pioneered the use of printed card backs (which was very hard to do with the technology of the time).

The beauty here is that because of Print on Demand I can allow customers to build their own deck.  They can choose the composition of their court.  They can pick four suits from the 8 I currently have.  They can pick a solid card back color or one of two designs.  The cost is still higher per unit, but the ability to have some say in the design of the deck will hopefully compensate for that.

I'll let you know how it works out for me.

99
Design & Development / Re: 14th Century Deck
« on: July 01, 2014, 01:40:35 PM »
I finished these.  Poker-size, King, Queen, Jack/Knave and 10-1 in the suits of cups, hawks, swords, and roses.  I think they look nice.  I'm going to print up a couple through makeplayingcards.com.

100
Design & Development / Re: 14th Century Deck
« on: May 12, 2014, 11:00:21 AM »
:D Yes, they certainly are.  Not in this deck, and probably not in the next three decks I'm working on, though.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5