You are Here:

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Don Boyer

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 811
76
A Cellar of Fine Vintages / Re: NYCC Kind Of Sort Of
« on: April 18, 2023, 10:39:36 AM »
This posting is an attempt at clarifying some of the numbers that often appear on various Aces of Spades among the many brands issued by NYCC. I found this information in a couple of mint decks that still contained the accompanying slips of paper inserted into their respective boxes. This represented one of the ways in which NYCC tried to improve their customer service and guarantee satisfaction.
The first two photographs show the front and back of one of these slips that indicate which sorter at the factory assembled the deck and placed it in it's OB. You will note the numbers "9" on the front and the stamped number "84" on the back. This slip was inserted into a NYCC deck with their celebrated Angel back and a tax stamp dated 1899 so this was the practice at around that time.
The third photograph shows a slip of paper that was inserted into a deck of Triton brand playing cards. Although the tax stamp for this deck is intact, the red cancellation is indistinct and so I cannot identify the date which would tell us when NYCC instituted this new practice of identifying which sorter handled any given deck.
The fourth picture shows the Ace of Spades where we can see the stamped numbers "5 8 4" in the lower right hand corner representing the new way of identifying which sorter handled this deck. Unfortunately, I am unable to determine the significance, if any, of the printed number "713" at the base of this card.
The fifth picture shows the wonderful back design for this deck entitled "Flower Dance" which shows a performer adorned in what appears to be colorful Japanese attire compete with handfuls, and a hat full, of flowers. If anyone can determine when this design was issued then we can determine the circa date when NYCC changed their method of identifying which sorter handled which deck and what measures would have been called for when the incorrect deck was returned to them for replacement.

Well, I don't have info on the age of the deck or the date when they instituted the new system for IDing sorters, but I have a few educated guesses for you.

The slip with the #9 on the front - that's the sorter, right?  The #84 on the back?  This might be a supervisor's or inspector's number, someone who was "next in line" in the chain of custody of the deck before it got sealed away in the box.

The Ace with the new inspector code - you're wondering about the small three-digit number that's printed on the card - as in printed when the card was made, rather than stamped on after manufacture, like the inspector code.  It's probably as simple as a production code, similar to what USPC eventually started using on their Aces of Spades to identify their print runs.  You'd know the production code at the time the project was going to press, so you could include it on the printing plates, but you really can't say who's going to sort it until it's being sorted.

77
The Conversation Parlor / Re: Factory Closed?
« on: April 18, 2023, 06:51:05 AM »
Hello,
    An executive at the casino where I am employed has informed the staff that "one of the only two manufacturers in North America" has closed their factory either during the pandemic or since... without selling their business but simply shutting down. Apparently this has lead to many casinos transferring their orders to the other factory, leading to a backlog and shortages in pre-shuffle cards. I'm wondering if anyone here knows the name of the manufacturer that closed down?
I hope I asked this in the right place, I am new here and this is my first post.
Thanks.

I personally know of only three manufacturers in the United States that are still active today.  (Sorry for the late answer.)

The biggest is the United States Playing Card Company (USPC), now a subsidiary of Cartamundi.

Next biggest is Gaming Partners International (GPI), which owns Gemaco (based in Missouri) and Paulson (based, I think, in Nevada, near Las Vegas), and a few others - all smaller companies which deal almost exclusively in manufacturing for casinos.

Smallest would be Liberty - they acquired some assets of some other small companies, but they're also pretty small themselves compared to the output of the other two companies.  I'd wager that their sister company, Gambler's Warehouse (formerly Gambler's General Store), does more business in terms of selling decks, mostly made by other companies, and handling order fulfillment for designers doing boutique projects, both privately-funded and crowdfunded.  I doubt they're who your boss is thinking of, as I don't think they do any casino work.

I know for a fact that USPC was closed for a while in the early days of the pandemic, and that the closing caused a backlog in orders - a backlog that was complicated by many factors involving screwed-up logistics chains worldwide and still exists today.  Compounding this issue is the fact that while anyone who reports to work stayed home, most graphic designers these days work from home and suddenly had time to kill - and kill it they did, making new deck designs and offering them on Kickstarter to people with time on their hands, a hankering for interesting-looking playing cards and extra money in their bank accounts.  This simply made the issue into more of a bottleneck.  Not all these projects were printed in the US, but a healthy percentage of them went to USPC to do the work.  The only "boutique" printers I know of doing this kind of work are located in Taiwan, mainland China, India and Ukraine, though the latter may no longer exist, what with the war and all.

It would not surprise me in the least to learn that GPI's printers were also shut down for a period of time during the pandemic and are suffering the same logistics and supply issues today.  USPC orders that used to take 6-8 weeks are taking months, I've been told - at least double the normal time.  While I have less current information now, it's probably still true to this day.

Everyone's feeling the pain on this one - companies of all sorts are still having supply chain snafus all up and down the line and products that used to be easy to obtain are at times difficult to impossible to find.  Last estimate I heard was that, on a global scale, the logistics issues companies are running into now won't be completely squared away until perhaps some time in 2025.

79
Hi Toby,

I must admit I always read the "gold borders" as meaning gold edges, however now I see that is not what was being described.   I have the girl standing at the beach, but she is in a No. 504 box.  Is it possible the numbers correspond to the different backs?

Actually, gold borders could be just that - gold borders.  Instead of a uniform band of white surrounding the back art, it would be printed into the bleed area with gold ink.  It was meant to look nearly as nice as a gilded deck but at a somewhat lower cost.  I can't say this for certain, but my bet would be that you're looking at a different model number on your box because it's for a different deck in the manufacturer's catalog - gold borders versus gold edges (a.k.a. gilding).

It's also not impossible that someone took that box and slipped a gilded deck into it - it happens a lot with older decks.  It's easy to understand, as well, that someone might confuse gold borders and gold edges, thus slipping a gilded deck into a box for gold-bordered cards.

When decks are this old, it's pretty common to find that the box fell apart long ago and no decent fragment of it remained with the cards.  I was always astounded at how the cards themselves could outlast the thing meant to protect them from rough handling, wear, light and dust.  But if someone wanted to protect a deck and the original wrapper or box was destroyed or lost, they'll grab the next best thing - the box from another deck.

80
Taking a quick stab at it, I'd estimate the first deck is from the turn of the century, circa 1900, plus or minus.  The rounded corners weren't as common until the 20th century, and neither were indices, but the early index designs were small much like this one.

The second deck looks slightly more contemporary - and is that gold ink on the backs?  Probably made in the post-Great-War years and before the Black Friday stock market crash - roughly 1919-1929.  Indices that large were uncommon on earlier decks, and gold ink was eschewed on most decks made during the Great Depression, when few people could afford to buy anything so fancy.

I'd say to try the World of Playing Cards website for more information.  They'd know more about decks originating from Europe and would have more examples on hand - most of the people here have most of their deck knowledge focused on American brands and products.  We know European decks a little, while they know them a lot.

81
A Cellar of Fine Vintages / Re: Help identifying several vintage decks
« on: April 18, 2023, 05:46:07 AM »
I do have one more item to post pictures of, but I want to get a good sleep in before I handle it as it is very fragile.  I'll leave you with one picture of it to ponder and will post more pictures tomorrow.

That red box looks like it's made of Bakelite - probably intended for holding one, maybe two decks (I can't tell how thick it is in the photo, but I'd guess its capacity is only one deck).  Nearly anything made of Bakelite has some monetary value to collectors of Bakelite items, especially because of how lovely and delicate these items could be - Bakelite was a precursor to modern plastics, but was much more brittle, so examples of it don't often survive as well.  Bakelite was popular with makers of small radios - not pocket-sized but plug-in models large enough to sit on a shelf or table - and Kem used them at one point for deck cases, eventually abandoning it like most companies that used it when sturdier plastics became more common - circa 1940s.

82
Playing Card Plethora / Re: First-Ever CardCon (Presented by Bicycle)
« on: April 18, 2023, 05:36:20 AM »
CardCon 2 has already been announced.  While the exact venue hasn't yet been revealed, it will take place in Manhattan on Saturday, November 4.  Tickets are not yet on sale and the line-up of guests and attractions hasn't been announced.

83
Playing Card Plethora / Re: How old is this Tally Ho deck?
« on: April 18, 2023, 05:32:50 AM »
Check out this post re: Bicycle decks.  http://www.playingcardforum.com/index.php?topic=13616.msg133246#msg133246

Your deck is from between 1980 - 1994 based on the type of bar code.   And, because there is no registered trademark symbol, it is pre-1990-ish.  So 1980s is my best guess.

I concur.  The fact that the seal is a sticker and not a moisture-based adhesive stamp with perforated top and bottom edges would also indicate 1980s, but no earlier than that.

84
It slowly dawned on me that decks of cards from the 1970s and 1980s are starting to get up there in age.  But they are readily available, even unopened.  But how to date the unopened decks?  I collected a bunch of Bicycle decks from the 70s to present, and noted how you can narrow down the date of a sealed deck of cards from the changes in the tuck.

*** All dates + / 1 a year given that tucks and decks may have been made in different years ***

If you have a bar code on the bottom right that starts with a floating 0, your deck was made between 1980 - 1994.

If your have a bar code on the bottom right with a non-floating 0, your deck was made between 1995 - 2000.

Additionally, Bicycle added the Registered Trademark symbol to the front of the tuck around 1991, and added small slits in the tongue of the tuck around 1994.

Bar code was moved to the bottom left around 2000.

If anyone else has some tips for dating sealed modern Bicycle decks, like when the white cellophane pull strip was in use, add them below.  And if I got something wrong, please let me know.

At some point in late 2009 (I think in October), the company shuttered the Cincinnati factory and shifted all production to the Erlanger, Kentucky plant.  With rare exception, the commonly-sold decks (non-collectibles, mass-produced) made after that point had black deck seals with white writing.  It took a little while thereafter for the decks to start listing "Erlanger, KY" as the company address on the side of the tuck box.  After another little while, they left out the city altogether and just listed the decks as being made in the USA on one side with the company name on the other.

Also, sometime not too after the relocation, the company started taking the "legalese" text about "rights reserved" and all that and printing it on the bottom of the tuck box instead of on the tongue of the top flap - it's on the right, across from the bar code.  The copyright year is always given as the year the tuck box was printed, and for mass produced decks, the copyright year is in most cases the same year that the deck itself was printed - sometimes they might have some leftover box stock at the start of a new year, but they use it up pretty quick and start using the new year version when they're done.  And in this case, it is the copyright, not the trademark - the common box design in use, the one that says "STANDARD" at the bottom of the face instead of "RIDER BACK" , came into existence when they moved, in 2009.  The previous model, called "Classic" by some collectors, "Rider Back" by others, and "Model 809" by USPC themselves, is still in print but only sold to magic shops and duck specialty stores - it has the same updates regarding legalese, location of the factory, etc., and is under copyright because the design came about around the middle of the 20th century - I'd guess 1950s, certainly no later than 1960s.  So the boxes are still copyrighted, while the older, unique artwork still in use is trademarked (too old to be copyrighted).

For opened decks, they're super easy to date if they're new enough.  Any of the new-print decks made after the relocation have additional numerals prefacing the production code printed on the Ace of Spades.  Prior to this, the letter in the production code was the largest clue for when the deck was printed, and it would only reveal the year.  Now, this prefix tells a more detailed story: the first two digits are the week of the year it was printed and the last two digits are the last two digits of the year.  For example, this week (the week of Tuesday, April 18, 2023) would have a prefix in the production code of 1523 - we're in the 15th week of this year.

Rarely will you see this prefix bearing the starting two digits of 51 or 52: the company shuts down the plant for the winter holidays, reopening in the new year.  I believe they take a similar two-week break in the summer, but I don't know precisely when - if I was guessing, I'd say coinciding with Independence Day.

85
A Cellar of Fine Vintages / Re: Help identifying another old deck
« on: April 18, 2023, 05:07:29 AM »
I have another old deck I am wondering about. (I work at a small museum where we are cataloging some old games and toys in our collection.) Could anyone tell me anything about these cards? Thank you!

Looks like it's a "skat" deck - a special deck of playing cards intended for playing a specific card game called "skat."  It's a lot like a pinochle deck, but way fewer cards.  I think skat decks had 32 cards - the low spot cards weren't used, so special decks made just for skat didn't include them - it made the deck less expensive.

Playing cards didn't become common household commodities until around the late 19th or early 20th century because of the cost of manufacture.  You watch old Westerns with people playing cards around the tables of a saloon - often, it was the saloon that owned the decks, not the players, and they'd get stored nightly in a deck vise to keep them flat and ready for use the next day.

I agree that this particular deck was very possibly French in origin, at least in terms of the original design.  It's also possible that some Eastern European deck maker may have copied the French designs to make their own cards - that, too, was a common practice in the mid-to-late 19th century.  "American" playing cards originated in Rouen, where cards for export were made and sold (the French considered the Parisian deck designs to be theirs, the Rouen cards to be inferior works).  From there, the British bought them, then copied the designs, and the Americans did the same to the Brits.  As a result, the International Standard came about by way of Rouen.

86
Thank you!!  I think you are correct about the Star Playing Cards being made by Perfection.
It?s amazing that new discoveries are still being made today.!
Is there another update of the Hochman Encyclopedia being planned? I?m sure there has been a lot of discoveries like this since the last update in 2004.

You're right in that there's still room for improvement and that there's new information being discovered all the time.

Up to now, the Hochman Encyclopedia went from Gene Hochman to Tom and Judy Dawson.  Tom passed away a few years back, and like the rest of us, Judy isn't getting younger.  Where the rights to reproduce will go from there, I do not know.  To my knowledge, Judy isn't working on a new version - the most recent and complete one in existence is the electronic one that was produced in conjunction with the Conjuring Arts Research Center.

You may well be looking at the only existing addendum to that volume of research, at least for now.  I'd wager the next version will wind up being some kind of online wiki-database.

87
Many younger magicians would balk at the hefty price tags that were commanded by these early factory printed decks, such as the Ultimate Marked Deck, which still retails for $40.  But at the time these came out, the concept of a printed Bicycle-branded marked deck with a reader system was still somewhat new, and magicians were happy to spend that kind of money on a versatile and quality marked deck like this, given how ground-breaking it was.  And of course you weren't just paying for the materials, but for the secret and the innovation. The price point of a lot of magic products is determined by a large number of different factors, which can include small print runs, development costs, and more, and isn't always as simple as what consumers seem to think when they just consider the cost of materials.

Actually, to be fair, the UMD wasn't always $40.  I recall getting a few packs for just $25 each back in '07, and not because of a sale.  The price only started to climb after USPC stopped permitting alterations of the Rider Back design, making the UMDs an instant collector's item.  I've been watching the price steadily creep higher over time.  The creators did manage to "pull a fast one" and sneak another print run onto the USPC presses after the ban, but that was the last print run and that was a handful of years ago at this point.  One should expect prices to continue to climb as fewer and fewer of the decks remain in existence, with even fewer still in circulation and actually being used.

For the readers who don't already know: USPC stopped permitting alterations of many of their classic, original designs - specifically old card backs, the Aces of Spades and the Jokers of many decks, particular the ones with the longest history.  The designs are too old to be protected under copyright law, so the company had to register them as trademarks to prevent other companies from using their designs.  While copyrights expire, trademarks can be renewed ad infinitum - but in order to receive protection, trademarks do indeed have to be periodically renewed and they have to be protected against "dilution", meaning close look-alike designs being offered for sale, even if they are the ones doing the offering.  Because dilution can render a trademark unprotectable, USPC doesn't allow any alterations of these designs, and that includes the creation of magician's gaff cards and marked decks.  For Aces of Spades and Jokers, you'll be asked to use either unique designs of your own devising (or for which you hold the copyright or written permission of the copyright holder) or generic ones as substitutes, but for card backs, there's no alternative option beyond using a wholly different card back.

The Maiden Back and Mandolin Back designs were intentionally created to look sort of like the Rider Back design, but not close enough to be considered an infringement of the trademark - and because they're fairly new designs, they have dozens of years left on their copyright protection, so trademarking them was never required.  It's why any new, factory-printed marked deck from USPC will not be a Rider Back - it will be either a Maiden Back, a Mandolin Back, something entirely different and still under copyright, or something in the public domain (which is printable by anyone, royalty-free).

88
Design & Development / Re: Macbeth Playing Cards - Need Some Feedback
« on: April 18, 2023, 03:37:42 AM »
Good afternoon everyone! This is my first time on this forum, so can't wait to talk to other passionate enthusiasts and collectors.

I producing my first project out of, hopefully, the many that I'm doing in the future. This playing card is based on Macbeth; everything from the themes, to the characters to the colour palate is based on the Shakespeare play. The project started early this year and I'm hoping to get a final draft done by August or September of this year. I wanted to launch a Kickstarter this year, but due to the uncertainties in the economy and the whole Ukraine-Russia war that's happening, which is affecting everything, I had to push the Kickstarter launch till next year.

In the mean time, I would like to show some of the artwork that has been produced for the first draft. Please provide some feedback about them, I would love to know what people are thinking about the design. Tell me what you like, what you don't like, any improvements and ideas.

The samples are in this imgur link: https://imgur.com/a/Ss7aUnF

Let me know what you think so far. Cheers!

Nice sketches.  I'd work on making the pips more attractive and the font more calligraphic, or at least like contemporary handwriting or print.  Don't fall for the faux aging trap - I'd go with a parchment or linen stock look to the background, but no aging effects; it's been played out and will only detract from the art.

Keep tabs on prices for getting your deck made.  Inflation is slowing down, but it's far from dead - prices have gone a little haywire, thanks to a handful of factors, not the least being the war in Ukraine, the pandemic's lasting effects on the supply chain and the recent collapse of three mid-sized banks.  You might get a quote today, be ready to print in two or three months, only to see the prices have gone up and you are no longer ready to print as a result.

Yeah, I know - not exactly timely tips...  :)

89
It turns out that somewhere in that message I had the incorrect code [ /inlineimg ] instead of [ /img ].  Fixing that allowed it to post.

Still strange that the error it produced was "The message body was left empty", when it clearly wasn't.

The incorrect code added may have rendered the message body as unseeable, therefore it was considered blank.

90
Playing Card Plethora / Re: The Whole Story of Walgreens STUD
« on: March 26, 2023, 10:19:26 AM »
It appears that this old courts design was used until about 1960.

Do you know the correct name for this courts design?
I compared it to the 1960 Aristocrat, thinking it was a familiar design.
But it was a slightly different design.
I don't know, so I would appreciate it if you could tell me.

Those faces look to me like standard ARRCO faces, which are in use today by a few brands, though not many - Crown decks from Blue Crown would be one standout example. USPC offers ARRCO faces for less than standard USPC faces with f you want to use them for your deck design.

92
2022 Diamond Awards - Nominee Topics / Re: DOTY: "Hummingbird Feathers"
« on: August 07, 2022, 01:04:43 PM »
...and just a few more photos!

93
2022 Diamond Awards - Nominee Topics / Re: DOTY: "Hummingbird Feathers"
« on: August 07, 2022, 01:04:16 PM »
Late breaking news!

I have some photos provided to me by Kellar O'Neil - he mentioned that the ones seen here previously were renders while these images are the genuine article; photographs of the actual deck.

Photos by Frank Cuvin, Sherman Tsao & Matt Fujiwara.

Enjoy and happy voting!

94

Surely the fact that it wasn't mentioned has to be an oversight? 


You are absolutely right, my friend!

With the large, and I mean LARGE, number of decks that come out in a given 12 months these days, it's easy for one to slip between the floorboards inadvertently.  Thanks a million for bringing this to the attention of the voters!

95
Introduce Yourself / Re: Hello all
« on: August 07, 2022, 04:30:34 AM »
Hi there. I've just joined the forum, hoping someone can help me identify a vintage deck. I'm not sure if this is the right forum, or the best way to go about this, as this is a rather explicit vintage adult deck.

Before anyone panics I'm not about to post any photos of the graphic content on the forum. I'm not that daft. Just wondering about the best part of the forum to post questions in, or, if not appropriate to ask about how to identify a deck like that here, could someone point me to a more appropriate forum for that kind of deck?

I wouldn't be asking, but it's rather important to trace it.

Thanks in advance,

52pack

First off, sorry for the delayed welcome.  Welcome!

Second, we have a board for discussion of vintage and antique decks: A Cellar of Fine Vintages.  That would be right up your alley.

Now, regarding the images - since we do get all ages around here, if you want to post images, I would ask that you post them redacted, concealing any parts that would be considered nudity, lascivious, prurient, etc.  If you aren't good with Photoshop or other paint programs, using trimmed Post-It notes would do the trick in a pinch.

If you have any other questions, feel free to reach out.

96
Now, on to Lorenzo's second project of the year, "Odd Fellows."  Created as the first official Portfolio52 deck, it celebrates the non-conformists in true off-the-wall fashion, inviting you to imbibe with them at the bar...if you dare.  They all look like truly fun packs of cards, done as they are in playful, almost radioactive colors - it's the kind of deck that I really wish was in regular production, it looks so cool and playable.

A grand total of six character-themed decks were made for the project: Uncle Tibia, Brass Monkey, a gilded, foil-backed limited-edition Sir Octo (a Kickstarter exclusive), a serial-numbered, gilded and foil-backed El Sapo the frog, and Jakko, the mini-deck with a jack-o-lantern design, and a Patronium-exclusive, serial-numbered deck, Dr. Crow.  The cards were manufactured by the Expert Playing Card Company.

As with the previous project, there were four prototype decks associated with this project: an Uncle Tibia and Brass Monkey in plain, hand-labeled boxes autographed by the artist and foil-sticker sealed versions of Uncle Tibia and Sir Octo.  Please remember that prototype decks are considered unfinished works and are not eligible when considering this project for Deck of the Year or the artist for Artist of the Year.

Kickstarter page: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/portfolio52/odd-fellows-playing-cards
Portfolio52 search results page: https://www.portfolio52.com/search?search_string=odd+fellows
Portfolio52 page for Dr. Crow: https://www.portfolio52.com/deck/18382/view
YouTube showcase of Dr. Crow by Stockholm17: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYJcf-bQLnU

97
2022 Diamond Awards - Nominee Topics / INTRODUCTION
« on: August 04, 2022, 03:56:59 PM »
Greetings and welcome to the voting period for the Sixth Annual Diamond Awards, hosted by 52 Plus Joker.

I'm Don Boyer, the chair of the Diamond Awards Committee.

The artists and decks shown in the topics below are the balloted nominees for Artist of the Year and Deck of the Year.  Voting is open to all members of 52 Plus Joker.  Not a member yet?  Check out the link below and sign up!
https://live-52plusjoker.pantheonsite.io/membership-account/membership-checkout/?level=1

In addition, there's a sticky topic containing additional information on the voting process.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

98
Working under the name Thirdway Industries (TWI, for short), Giovanni Meroni is one of those artists who tries to give Jackson Robinson a run for his money, in terms of the number of decks he releases each year.  In the eligibility period, he released Galaxia, Poison and a reprint of his first ever project, with its reprinted companion deck: Good & Evil.

Galaxia is inspired by the dystopian sci-fi stories of the mid-20th century.  The three editions of the deck (Promessa, Altezza and Domina [the limited edition of the series]) tell the story of human colonists traversing the galaxy to reach Terra-2, their new home.  In addition, he tacked on two more editions through the campaign, Intregra (a design tweak of the Domina deck, intended initially for Kickstarter backers only) and Superba (a limited, gilded version with a black background design).  Meroni considers it to be a direct sequel to the totalitarian government-based series, Order.  The decks were printed by USPC, except Superba, which was printed by Expert PCC. (Images 1 & 2)

Poison has a looser story, based around pharmacists and poisoners in America during the Roaring '20s.  The editions of this project are Aspis (green, unlimited, printed approximately 2,000 copies), Kingslayer (a gilded, Kickstarter-exclusive version of Aspis, limited to 888 copies) and Belladonna (pink background on the faces, holographic foil on the backs, limited to 1,500 decks).  The first two were printed by USPC, while Belladonna was printed by Legends PCC. (Images 3 & 4)

And finally, there's the reprints - The Evil Deck was created in 2014 as a result of Meroni winning a contest on this forum before it was purchased by 52 Plus Joker, the prize of the contest being to have your deck printed by Expert PCC.  The companion deck, the Good Deck, was designed later but not printed after trying unsuccessfully to crowdfund the project on the now-defunct Decklauncher website.  Many TWI fans have asked Meroni in the intervening years about the Good Deck, but he decided that the files for it on his computer were just too old and needed an update - and he didn't want to update the Good Deck design without matching it with the Evil Deck!  The biggest update was on the spot cards - both decks now have artistic images instead of uniform suit pips on them, with standard pips in the indices only.  Both decks this time around were printed by USPC.  (Image 5)

The project pages:
Galaxia, on Kickstarter: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/thirdwayind/galaxia-playing-cards/description
Poison, on Kickstarter: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/thirdwayind/poison-playing-cards/description
Good & Evil, V2, on the Thirdway Industries web store: https://www.thirdwayindustries.com/product/good-evil-v2/

99
2022 Diamond Awards - Nominee Topics / AOTY: Lotrek/Oath Playing Cards
« on: August 04, 2022, 03:49:44 PM »
Two-time Diamond Award-winner Lotrek is nominated this year for Artist of the Year.  He produced two decks during the award period - Maestro III and Tale of the Tempest.

Maestro III is a subtle design compared to some of Lotrek's more elaborate decks, more targeted towards players than collectors.  There is an elegant to its simplicity - it's a deck you really want to shuffle up and deal at your poker table.  (Images 1 and 2)

Tale of the Tempest is a project that was produced by the prominent and prolific deck reviewer, The Gentleman Wake.  The various editions available are Ocean (blue/gold/navy), Dusk (eggplant/purple/copper), Midnight (black/gold/gunmetal), Treasured (two-tone gold), Dynastinae (green/gold), Prism (pearl/prismatic) and Great Wylenti (black/gold), as well as an all-gaff card deck.  All versions are done with foil stamped backs except Great Wylenti.  Tuck boxes were all made by Lotrek at Oath Playing Cards, cards were all made at Cartamundi on their B9 Slimline stock.  A great deal of attention to detail was given to this design, replete with card reveals and fine details peppered throughout the artwork.

Maestro III at Lotrek's web store: https://www.oathplayingcards.com/product-page/maestro-iii-playing-cards-1
Tale of the Tempest at Kickstarter: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/thegentlemanwake/the-tale-of-the-tempest-playing-cards/description

100
2022 Diamond Awards - Nominee Topics / AOTY: Jack Brutus Penny
« on: August 04, 2022, 03:45:15 PM »
Based in Kanagawa, Japan, Jack Brutus Penny, an artist who works in many media, made a big splash with his first deck release in 2019.  Sensu is his second playing card project to date.  As with his first project, the proceeds were used to help support animal welfare.

The Japanese word sensu means "folding fan" in English.  Beyond its luxurious design and appointments, these two decks contain innovations that I've never seen in any other deck preceding them.  Fuyu-no-Sensu ("Winter?s Fan", in turquoise) and Haru-no-Sensu ("Spring's Fan", in vermillion) have unique faces incorporating seasonal botanicals in their design with angled, art-covered border which create a complete artistic scene when fanned in specific patterns, such as the spot cards or the court cards from a single suit, much like the intricate designs painted on some of the finest Japanese fans.  The Fuyu-no-Sensu deck is closer to the artist's vision in terms of an unblemished canvas for his art - the court cards have no indices and the deck comes with a Japanese folding screen, or byobu, crafted by hand by Kyoto-based byobu artisans.  The Haru-no-Sensu deck is more of a compromise design, with indices for card players.  There is a third deck, limited to only 50 packs - it's the "Golden Winter's Fan": Fuyu-no-Sensu with metallic inks and foils switched to gold.  The fourth and final deck is "The Full-Blossoming Fan": Haru-no-Sensu in a 250-deck limited edition of gilded decks with foiled, cut deck sleeves.

The project was limited to 1,000 decks of each of the two main deck designs, individually serial-numbered.  The entire project's decks were manufactured by the Expert Playing Card Company, using classic stock with metallic inks, packed into tuck boxes with foil details and heavy, textured stock.

Kickstarter project: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/jackbrutuspenny/sensu
Artist website page on playing cards, including this and the previous project: https://www.jackbrutuspenny.com/playing-cards

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 811