Semi-related question: who is the manufacturer of the second king shown in the original post?  I saw the king of diamonds in that style earlier this week, and when asked which deck that was from I found myself unable to answer.

Really difficult to do this without the face cards or aces, but I’ll give a couple of them a shot.

A) The shape of the clubs signify a German maker, likely Wust around 1860 or so, given the lack of indices.  I’d guess Hamburg pattern, but it’s just a guess.

E) Your DeLand deck is a marked deck, used by magicians.  Don may be better at explaining this than I (as I don’t own a DeLand deck), but there are white spots on the various circles and flowers that denote the rank and suit of the card.

F) This deck is the Belgian-Genoese pattern, based on the Parisian pattern.  It’s almost certainly a European manufacturer, but without the Jack of Clubs there’s no way to know which one (makers are typically listed on the Jack’s shield).

And anyone know what kind of a bird that is on the joker?  I thought seagull, but I don't think seagulls hunt other birds.

Short beak and carrying prey in its talons suggests hawk, but I can't place it any closer than that.

2016 copyright date on the box, X code on the Ace (if it still matters?), printed in Erlanger.
The two ad cards are coupons for chips and candy that expire on 12/31/17.

I didn't notice the one-way back until you pointed it out, Don.
Funny how magicians tend to have better observational skills than we "muggles"...
(or is it a more active imagination for deviousness and trickery, I ask in jest?)

iPhone pic, so not the best, but here you go.

I wish my French wasn't non-existent.
I see a couple of lots that I wouldn't mind adding to my collection.

Don: I've added a couple of my own pictures to the bottom of this post.
Thank you for posting the auction ones already.

It's funny that you mention the mentality of "nobody would want these,
so why save them".  Game shows themselves suffered the same fate;
videotape was expensive, so tapes containing shows considered to have
no future value were wiped so the videotape could be reused.  Gambit
aired 910 episodes during its CBS run, but for decades only SIX of those
were known to have survived.  Within the past couple of years, original
host Wink Martindale discovered several episodes on Betamax tape in his
personal archive and has since posted them to YouTube.

One of those episodes suggests that at least three decks were on the set
(main game/bonus round/next main game); my fellow game show fans have
strongly suggested that a fourth was kept backstage to quickly replace
damaged cards without having to stop filming.  Still, to their extensive game
show contacts and knowledge, no others were known to remain in existence
at the time I asked (Wink's staff told me even he didn't have one).

Regarding smaller-sized promotional decks, I do know that one was made
for "Card Sharks", but unfortunately it did not feature the same faces as the
cards on the show.  Interestingly enough, this deck is certainly related to a
deck used on one other game show, and may (if my surmise proves accurate)
be related to Card Sharks as well.  Still researching...

Below is a picture showing all the face cards (you can see the QD and AD
missing from the eBay deck, as well as the Snidely Whiplash-inspired Jack),
and also the middle of a Solitaire game which takes up an entire living room.
I notice that the pips are designed to be as vertical as possible (the pips on
the fives are arranged in a single column); this allows the index numerals to
be maximized so they can be seen easily by a studio audience.

PrincessTrouble:

It's based off the Trophy Whist design from 1895, which apparently didn't catch on because it was too radical a departure from the "traditional" courts for players of the time.
Paul's done some amazing work in updating it for a modern audience.

Simon Wintle has some pictures of the Trophy Whist deck at his site:
http://www.wopc.co.uk/usa/uspcc/trophy-whist

If I may offer an alternate explanation...

I believe the second deck reads "P Gow 2".  Pai gow poker is a fairly popular casino game, particularly among Asian players.  Casino decks, particularly for games where the players actually handle the cards themselves, are frequently changed so as to prevent marking and other forms of cheating.  When a deck is retired from play, it is sorted to ensure all cards are still present, then replaced in the box.  The box is labeled with the time and date the deck was used in play, what game it was used for, and signed off by the boss in charge of the pit.  The decks are often sold off in casino gift shops, though the cards are marked so they can't be brought back into play (typically by clipping corners or drilling a hole through the deck).

I'm afraid your signatures are only those of casino employees.

I believe this pattern is commonly referred to as the Berlin pattern.
Written along the sides of the Jack of Clubs is the following:
"Vereinigte Altenburger und Stralsunder Spielkarten-Fabriken AG
Stuttgart Leinfelden".
"Vereinigte" means "united"; "Spielkarten-Fabriken" is "playing card
factory"; "AG" is short for "Aktiengesellschaft", or a type of shareholding
company; and Stuttgart and Leinfelden are neighboring cities.
Altenburger and Stralsunder is referred to by the acronym "ASS"; the
company was eventually sold to Cartamundi in the early 2000s.
ASS moved production to Leinfelden in 1956, so the cards can be dated
no earlier than that.

I finally found my copy of this deck; sure enough, it was in the last place I looked.

My copy comes without 13-spots, oddly enough.  The back is one I don't recognize,
nor is it in the database of Bicycle backs. 

Tax stamps are 2-cent stamps, but printed over them is lettering reading as follows:
"10-4-1917  7 CENTS  USP(C)Co" (the C in the last line is on a missing portion
of the stamp, but can be reasonably inferred.)  Unsure why two stamps were
necessary; any ideas?

AoS code reads "1 17", while the Joker reads "X 167".  If the Joker code is the
same as the customary AoS code, this also points to a 1917 date for this deck.

Quote from: Daniel Wilson on April 24, 2014, 08:08:42 PM

I didn't miss THIS window!  Order #1288!
(Unfortunately Boss Lady told me I could only get 2 instead of the full allotment of 4.)
Keep up the great work, Paul!

You should have bought 2 pair at $40 a pair. 

....she was looking over my shoulder at the time.
Might have worked otherwise.    ^_^;